On this page
At a glance
- Open any manuscript from the editorial desk; no downloading and re-uploading.
- Screening, the anonymous copy for double-blind review and the reference check in one tab.
- Reviewer comments gathered per round and turned into the revision notes for the author.
- Copyediting, layout and proofs saved straight to the right stage of the submission.
Writing Labs is the manuscript editor built into the editorial desk. Each role sees its own tab: the Editor in Chief and the editors see screening, assessment and decisions; copyeditors, layout editors and proofreaders see the tools of their stage. Everything is saved to the manuscript's submission in the journal, so the record stays complete.
Problems before Writing Labs
- Every step started with downloading a file from the journal system, editing it on a laptop and uploading it again, which produced many copies and uncertainty about which one was current.
- Anonymising a manuscript by hand for double-blind review, with names left in headers, comments or document properties.
- Checking references one by one for missing citations and broken DOIs.
- Copying reviewer comments into the decision letter and the author's revision request by hand.
- Copyedit and proof corrections sent to authors by e-mail, answered in another file, and merged again.
- Page numbers, the citation line and the publication data of each article worked out separately for every issue.
Screening
- The screening form next to the manuscript: scope, template, completeness and originality, with notes that stay with the manuscript.
- The anonymous copy for double-blind review: export an anonymous Word copy and see what is still left (names, affiliations, file details) before it goes to the reviewers.
- The manuscript check against the journal template, and the reference check (uncited entries, citations without an entry, DOIs that do not resolve).
Peer review and decisions
- The assessment and decision form of each round opens beside the text.
- Reviewer comments from the round are gathered in one panel; export them or turn a comment into a revision note for the author.
- One decision letter per round, written from the assessment and the revision notes.
- When the author revises in Writing Labs you see the tracked changes and the author's answer to every point.
Copyediting, layout and proofs
- Copyediting with tracked changes; save the copyedited version to the copyediting stage and ask the author to check it.
- Compare versions side by side (submitted, revised, copyedited).
- Layout: page setup, headers and footers, export to PDF and save the production file and the galley status to the production stage.
- Proofreading: ask the author to check the proof; the answer comes back into the same manuscript.
- The production readiness check lists what is still missing before publication.
Publication data
- The publication panel shows the issue, the article's pages within the issue (kept in step with the other articles), the citation line and the publication date.
- The author's publication certificate is prepared from the same data.
Working together
- Comments in the margin, tracked changes to accept or reject, version history with labels.
- Chat with the contributors and the journal's discussions for each stage, without leaving the manuscript.
Rules that do not change
Writing Labs supports the editors; it does not make editorial decisions. Decisions follow the peer review policy and publication ethics. Payment and partner arrangements are never visible in the assessment tools and never influence a decision.
Getting access
Writing Labs opens from the editorial desk for editorial team members whose role the journal has enabled. Questions go to [email protected].


