Exploring Pragmatic Functions: A Speech Act Analysis of Conversations among Elementary School Students Using Articulate Storyline to Enhance English Speaking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i1.262Keywords:
Pragmatic Functions; Speech Act Theory; Discourse Analysis; SpeakingAbstract
The increasing integration of digital tools in education prompts questions about their effectiveness in enhancing key language skills, particularly pragmatic competence. Pragmatic competence refers to the ability to use language appropriately in various social contexts, a skill crucial for effective communication. Despite the growing integration of technology in language learning, there remains a gap in developing students’ ability to use language appropriately in real-life interactions, particularly in non-native English contexts. Purpose: This study aims to investigate the role of Articulate Storyline, an interactive digital tool, in enhancing pragmatic competence among elementary school students (ages 10-12) in Indonesia. Specifically, it investigated how Articulate Storyline can stimulate students’ use of speech acts (locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts) in real-word communication settings such as the classroom, library and garden. Research Methodology: The study employed a descriptive qualitative research design, using speech act theory as a framework to analyse the pragmatic functions in students’ conversations. Data was collected from 125 students who engaged with Articulate Storyline in their English language lessons. Conversations were transcribed and analysed to identify the frequency and types of speech acts used in different contexts. The study focuses on how students utilize language in both structured (classroom) and informal (library, garden) settings. Findings: It is indicated that Articulate Storyline significantly enhanced students’ pragmatic competence especially in personal experiences. Conclusion: The study also revealed that conversational context (formal vs informal) played a crucial role in shaping types of speech acts, collaborative, critical and learning engagement.
Downloads
References
[1] M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, and others, “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
[2] L. Jiang, “The Affordances of Digital Multimodal Composing for EFL Learning,” ELT J., vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 413–422, 2017, doi: 10.1093/elt/ccw098.
[3] Z. Deng, Constructing Powerful Curriculum Theory. 2024. doi: 10.4324/9781032712802.
[4] G. C. Longji, “Pragmatic Use of Direct and Indirect Speech Acts of Students in Public Primary Schools in Plateau State, Nigeria,” Creat. Saplings, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 90–108, 2025, doi: 10.56062/gtrs.2025.4.06.989.
[5] C. Hadza, A. Sesrita, and I. Suherman, “Development of Learning Media Based on Articulate Storyline,” Indones. J. Appl. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 80–85, 2020, doi: 10.30997/ijar.v1i2.54.
[6] X. Qi and Z. Chen, “A Systematic Review of Technology Integration in Developing L2 Pragmatic Competence,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15020172.
[7] J. R. Searle, “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts,” 1968.
[8] K. M. N. T. K. Bandara, C. R. Hettiwaththege, and K. G. W. K. Katukurunda, “An Overview of Teaching Methods for Fostering Generation Alpha (Gen Alpha) Learning Process,” Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev., vol. 5, 2024.
[9] A. Saralee, Y. Fitria, E. Sukma, and A. Hidayati, “The Development of E-Module IPAS Based on Problem Based Learning Assisted with Articulate Applications to Improve Students Think Critically,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2032–2040, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.7014.
[10] S. R. Ansari and I. N. Qamari, “Artificial Intelligence and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes with Bibliometric and Content Analysis for Future Research Agenda,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00865-0.
[11] H. Hagemark and P. Gardenfors, “Expressives, Directives and Assertions: Cognitive Dimensions of Speech Acts,” Lang. Commun., vol. 101, pp. 84–104, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2025.02.003.
[12] R. Sahar and M. Munawaroh, “Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education with Bibliometric and Content Analysis for Future Research Agenda,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01086-z.
[13] A. Amaliah, “A Review Article of the Pragmatics Competence in EFL Learning Context,” Al Qalam J. Ilm. Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 776–790, 2024, doi: 10.35931/aq.v18i1.3163.
[14] L. Yang, “Exploring the Learning Benefits of Website-Delivered Pragmatics Instruction: The Case of L2 Mandarin Chinese,” Foreign Lang. Ann., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2025, doi: 10.1111/flan.12797.
[15] K. Swargiary, “The Impact of Digital Learning Environments on Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Development in Generation Alpha Children: A Comparative Analysis.” 2024.
[16] R. Li and Y. Meng, “Factors Influencing the Quality of Online Teaching: Application of DEMATEL and Cluster Technology,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 163–177, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i13.40393.
[17] D. Ramsingh and S. Renwick, “Teaching and Learning Resources,” in Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science, vol. 1, 2025, pp. 572–592. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-95689-5.00211-X.
[18] R. L. Shively, “Assessing L2 Pragmatic Competence,” in New Directions in Second Language Pragmatics, 2021, pp. 131–141. doi: 10.1515/9783110721775-010.
[19] A. Queir’os, D. Faria, and F. Almeida, “Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods,” Eur. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 369–387, 2017, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.887089.
[20] M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 2019.
[21] C. Kandiko Howson and M. Kingsbury, “Curriculum Change as Transformational Learning,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1847–1866, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2021.1940923.
[22] E. M. Rebelo, “Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Proposal for a Transversal Curricular Unit,” J. Form. Des. Learn., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41686-024-00097-9.
[23] Y. Yan, “The Effect of Pragmatic Competence on the Communicative Competence of Second Language Learners,” in Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2022), 2022, pp. 368–372. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220706.074.
[24] H. Baktir, “Speech Act Theory: Austin, Searle, Derrida’s Response and Deleuze’s Theory of Order-Word,” Epiphany, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 100–111, 2014, doi: 10.21533/epiphany.v6i2.74.
[25] K. Paluanova, “Evaluating Pragmatic Competence in Language Learners Through an Assessment of Current Measurement Tools,” Emergent J. Educ. Discov. Lifelong Learn., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2024, doi: 10.47134/emergent.v3i4.45.
[26] J. R. Searle, “What is a Speech Act?,” 1968.
[27] J. I. Liontas, “Developing Idiomatic Competence in the ESOL Classroom: A Pragmatic Account,” TESOL J., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2015, doi: 10.1002/tesj.230.
[28] J. M. Sykes, “Interlanguage Pragmatics, Curricular Innovation, and Digital Technologies,” CALICO J., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 120–141, 2018, doi: 10.1558/cj.36175.
[29] Y. Chen, “Enhancing Language Acquisition: The Role of AI in Facilitating Effective Language Learning,” in Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Humanities, Wisdom Education and Service Management, 2024, pp. 593–600. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-253-8_71.
[30] C. Latorre-Cosculluela, V. Sierra-Sanchez, and S. Vazquez-Toledo, “Gamification, Collaborative Learning and Transversal Competences: Analysis of Academic Performance and Students’ Perceptions,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00361-2.
[31] W. Widana, “The Effect of Teacher’s Responsibility and Understanding of the Local Wisdom Concept on Teacher’s Autonomy in Developing Evaluation of Learning Based on Local Wisdom in Special Needs School,” J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 23, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v23i10.6189.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mungkap Mangpaul Siahaan, Rudi Hartono, Yuliati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any third-party materials included in their work have proper permissions.
