Challenges of Instructional Leadership Related to Teacher Performance at Sabak Auh Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59211/mjpjetl.v4i1.289Keywords:
Instructional leadership; Teacher performance; Technology integration; School principal; Qualitative research;Abstract
This study aims to analyze the challenges faced by the school principal in implementing instructional leadership to improve teacher performance at SMP Sabak Auh. Based on findings from the Education Report, although instructional leadership is categorized as good, the quality of teaching remains moderate. This indicates that despite the principal's active role in formulating a vision, managing learning programs, and creating a positive learning climate, the implementation has not fully impacted the quality of teaching. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive and phenomenological methods, collecting data through documentation, interviews, and observations. The findings show that the principal adopts a collaborative approach in setting learning goals, involving all teachers. However, the biggest challenge is the differing understanding among teachers regarding the implementation of these goals in the classroom, as well as the lack of technological skills among some teachers. The principal has implemented continuous training to address these challenges, but limited technological facilities and varying levels of teacher readiness remain obstacles. This study recommends strengthening the provision of technological facilities, enhancing training based on the practical needs of teachers, and increasing opportunities for teacher collaboration to improve teaching quality and achieve learning goals.
Downloads
References
[1] P. Hallinger and J. Murphy, “Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals,” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 217–247, 1985.
[2] L. S. Shulman, “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching,” Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 4–14, 1986, doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004.
[3] N. Annisa, D. Nasution, and Y. Yahfizham, “Instructional leadership: Enhancing teacher professionalism,” Instr. Dev. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/IDJ/article/download/37536/12394
[4] Elfira et al., “How does principal’s instructional leadership shape teacher performance mediated by teacher self-efficacy in Indonesian education context?,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. Article 1401394, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1401394.
[5] I. Ramadani, D. Nasution, and N. Tanjung, “Principal instructional leadership at SMP Muhammadiyah 48 Medan,” Semant. J. Ilmu Bhs. Sastra, vol. 14, no. 2, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://journal.aspirasi.or.id/index.php/Semantik/article/download/1661/1884
[6] E. Kundiastuti, H. Supriyanto, and W. Prasetyo, “Implementation of principal instructional leadership at SMP Negeri 2 Warungasem,” Cetta J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/cetta/article/download/4247/2003/17009
[7] M. Fauzi, A. Rahman, and S. Nurlela, “Instructional leadership strategies for improving teacher performance and professional development,” Reflect. J., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.aripafi.or.id/index.php/Reflection/article/download/1102/1023/5567
[8] Sugiyono, Qualitative, quantitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta, 2021.
[9] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2020.
[10] G. Yukl, Leadership in Organizations, 8th ed. Pearson Education, 2017.
[11] K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi, “Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices,” Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 201–227, 2006, doi: 10.1080/09243450600565829.
[12] C. D. Glickman, S. P. Gordon, and J. M. Ross-Gordon, Supervisory Leadership in Education, 8th ed. Pearson Education, 2007.
[13] C. Day, Q. Gu, and P. Sammons, “The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 221–258, 2016.
[14] R. E. Anderson and S. L. Dexter, “School technology leadership: A review of the literature,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–82, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0013161X04269504.
[15] T. R. Guskey, “Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development,” Educ. Leadersh., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 45–51, 2002.
[16] C. Day and K. Leithwood, “Successful school leadership: Linking with learning and achievement,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 18–24, 2007, doi: 10.3102/003465431415160.
[17] B. Berkelaar, A. K. Dawson, and A. M. Eakle, “Impact of technology training on teacher competence and instructional practices,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 38–49, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42728947
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
URN
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lendra Sosana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any third-party materials included in their work have proper permissions.






